Most people are unimpressed by the fact that flow provides an optimal subjective experience, but their interest immediately perks up at any suggestion that it might improve performance. If it could be demonstrated that a fullback played harder if he was in flow, or that an engineer turned in a better product if he was in flow, then they would immediately embrace the concept and make a great deal of it. This, of course, would effectively destroy the autotelic nature of the experience. – Trying Not to Try by Edward Slingerland

There is a way to solve the above mentioned conflict by learning

Tools

Notes

Afferent and Efferent

Type Direction Function Example
Afferent Body → Brain Carries sensory input from the body to the central nervous system Feeling the texture of a surface; hearing a sound
Efferent Brain → Body Carries motor commands or autonomic output from the CNS to the body Moving your arm; regulating heart rate

👉 Think: Afferent = “Arriving” at the brain. Efferent = “Exiting” the brain.

STER Quality Neural Shift Afferent/Efferent Pattern
Selflessness Quieted prefrontal self-systems ↓ Afferent “self” signals
Timelessness Reduced time-tracking in PFC ↓ Afferent time data
Effortlessness Optimized motor and autonomic control ↑ Efficient efferent flow
Richness Heightened sensory integration ↑ Clean, high-fidelity afferent data

See

Links