Pure abstraction
- its the proper use of the mind
- the mind is a organ of perception and that is what it sees
- you can only learn that by styding nature
- its there and not there at the same time
- unlike categorical-abstraction you don't see it, but it is really there
- examples
- DNA in evolution
- fibonaccis, fracts, holy geometry?
- pythagoras
- not linguistic abstactions
- not symbols in the sense of is common use
- math being more real than just being symbols
- how is this related to structure-preserving-transformation
- can artificial-intelligence see pure abstractions?
- are action-protocols
- robost
- are not abstraction that point to other abstractions
the undifferentiated aesthetic continuum by whithead
- using abduction
- making heals the maker
- quality-without-a-name
- the-natural-state
- goethe: He called this “anschauende Urteilskraft” — intuitive judgment or seeing with understanding.
- You don’t just see the leaf; you see the law of the leaf—the pattern, the transformation, the generative idea.
- This is not fantasy; it is a disciplined imagination, trained to perceive wholeness, relationships, and hidden dynamics.
- humbold:
- intuitive judgment
He used instruments, yes—but he believed instruments reveal only pieces, and mind completes the whole.
- Imagination as a scientific instrument