Pure
abstraction
its the proper use of the mind
the
mind
is a organ of
perception
and that is what it sees
you can only learn that by styding nature
its there and not there at the same time
unlike
categorical-abstraction
you don't see it, but it is really there
examples
DNA in evolution
fibonaccis, fracts, holy geometry?
pythagoras
not linguistic abstactions
not symbols in the sense of is common use
math
being more real than just being symbols
how is this related to
structure-preserving-transformation
can
artificial-intelligence
see pure abstractions?
are
action-protocols
robost
are not
abstraction
that point to other abstractions
the undifferentiated aesthetic continuum by whithead
using
abduction
Lookup
A Mysterious Design That Appears Across Millennia | Terry Moore | TED
]
Speculative Cosmology from a Pop-Up Kind of (W)hole
#to-watch