- naive trust
- its when you have repression of emotions
- when you try to trust and ignore signals
- when you try to be the good guy
- non-naive trust
- you know you can handle surpises, that they are not a bit deal if they happen
- your stance is of an unquestioning attitude where you are not ignore signals but you they are also just that. almost absent from your integrated relaxed satisfaction stance that they are not a bit deal to you.
- trust should always mean non-naive trust
- it otherway is a flake & flimsy trust
- there are other words that better fit this state than trust
- in general, trust-building works via respecting that distrust
- since trust ~= subjective truth, this process is literally perceiving the world together
- he is now more playing with the concept of high discernment
from https://youtu.be/N--CnymcDcM?si=BLFPynK4iHIByBt9&t=1748
it uses the trust as the key concept. and it should not mean that anything we need to do is create trust. what we need to do is create an environment where people care more about discerning what is true and trust that. and so you might say something that risks breaking that trust. so vulnerability is what in this understand can break trust but actually build trust. because you otherwise try to hit every lever that creates trust but that actually can create mistrust. the actual move is something that has the possibility to create distrust in the other person. its capacity-to-hold-paradox. so in that vulnerability(that is my actual experience) i don't know how the other might react, that can create the possibility of a stronger container (so this is what can create trust).
References