Process Philosophy

TODO research Alfred North Whitehead
- Scientists animated by the purpose of proving themselves purposeless constitute an interesting subject for study.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_and_Reality
- https://socialecologies.wordpress.com/2012/12/18/whiteheads-speculative-philosophy-speculum-of-experience/
relations in process philosophy are not the same as relationships as in networks
- https://medium.com/perspectives-on-complexity/resilience-reconsidered-8733983f4b2f
questions
- how related to tao?
from https://jimruttshow.blubrry.net/bonnitta-roy/
- process-philosophy vs complexity science
- reification in complexity science which is problematic
  - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reification_(computer_science)
- science actually does not postulate absolute but rather implicitly holds the understanding that current understandings are nothing more then our current best ways to grasp something.
  - its not a technology
  - its a process for model building
  - if-then propositions and then hypophothes out of them and test further
- relation of causality science and complexity
- there are evolution and developmental processes
- what is emergence
  - top-down and bottom-up coming together
- questions
  - what affordance does dendron provide.
    - like what evolution does it allow through its kind
- practical/usefull reification
  - look into iain-mcgilchrist
  - they have duration
    - scales in process philospohy are not spatial, they are temporal durations
      - duration of a lifetime of the human body
      - how does duration relate to identity of things, when things are defined by their temporal durations?
      - de-spacial complexity
      - things rising and falling with a signatur of duration which you could call scalar in spatial terms
  - switch inside/outside concrete metaphore,frame into this notion of duration and internal/external relationship
30:00

References